Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Supreme Court has agreed to review the validity of minimum cut-off marks in judicial service recruitment interviews, responding to concerns regarding fairness in the selection process.
The Calcutta High Court quashed S.148 reassessment notices, ruling them invalid due to being issued beyond the statutory limitation period.
The RBI has released its 46th Half-Yearly Report on the management of foreign exchange reserves, enhancing transparency in the forex management practices in India.
A recent Delhi HC ruling underscores challenges and complexities within the evolving jurisprudence of personality rights in India as it granted rights to Anil Kumar Tiwari.
The Delhi High Court issued an ad-interim injunction against the defendants in Ivy Entertainment v. Rahul Singh, raising questions about copyright protection on distinct lyrical hooks.
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court examined the conflict between trademark registration priority and established goodwill in the marketplace, arising from the ongoing '20-20' trademark dispute.
This week's review highlights key updates in Indian copyright law, particularly focusing on the Delhi High Court's notable ruling in Bansal v. Philips. Additionally, insights into the evolving landscape of personality rights in India are showcased.
The ITAT Mumbai ruled that reassessment notices served after the limitation period are invalid, setting a precedent for timely compliance in tax assessments.
The court found discrepancies in share premium allocations, asserting that remand for factual verification was necessary rather than relying on probability. This reaffirms the need for substantiating claims with concrete evidence.
SEBI is scrutinizing AI-powered investment advisory platforms, stating fintech firms and registered advisers are accountable for AI-generated recommendations. This highlights emerging compliance challenges in financial services.
The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by the Income Tax Department, ruling that they failed to substantiate claims under the exceptional category to bypass a low tax effect limit.
The NCLT has admitted an insolvency plea against an online gaming firm due to a loan default of ₹2.81 crore, emphasizing the time value of money principle.