Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court affirmed that although breaching Section 269SS incurs penalties, such a breach does not render a cash loan unenforceable under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
FeaturedThe removal of the film 'Satluj' from ZEE5 raises critical questions regarding censorship, copyright laws, and access to cultural content in India, showcasing potential regulatory overreach.
FeaturedThe Calcutta High Court has ruled that Income Tax Returns (ITR) are essential for calculating compensation in motor accident cases, enhancing the award to the family of a deceased doctor.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court's ruling in Flipkart v. Marc addresses the concept of house marks, raising critical questions about trademark law's framework in India.
FeaturedThe Bombay High Court's recent ruling emphasizes substantive justice over procedural defaults under the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, raising questions on legislative intent.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court reinstated a customs broker's licence after ruling that the mandatory 90-day timeline under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR 2018 was not adhered to during revocation. This judgment emphasizes the importance of procedural adherence in administrative actions.
FeaturedThe Kerala High Court upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) power to attach properties acquired prior to the commission of a predicate offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The petitioners' failure to seek alternative remedies contributed to the verdict.
FeaturedThe Allahabad High Court has ordered a crackdown on advocates involved in criminal activity in Uttar Pradesh, highlighting systemic issues in the Bar associations.
FeaturedThe Bar Council of India (BCI) has introduced stringent regulations governing advocates' social media conduct. Advocates must now designate Social Media Ethics Nodal Officers and ensure transparency in content creation.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court's refusal to stay an injunction in Flipkart v. Marc raises legal questions surrounding house marks and trademark confusion.
FeaturedIn a pivotal ruling, the Bombay High Court addresses procedural timelines under the Trade Marks Rules, prioritizing substantive justice over strict adherence to procedures.
FeaturedThe ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings for Global Cricket Corporation citing the absence of mandatory notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. This establishes the importance of adherence to procedural norms.