The Kerala High Court upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) power to attach properties acquired prior to the commission of a predicate offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The petitioners' failure to seek alternative remedies contributed to the verdict.
Kerala HC Affirms ED’s Authority to Attach Pre-Predicate Offence Properties
The Kerala High Court has affirmed the Enforcement Directorate's authority to attach properties acquired before the commission of a predicate offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The court underscored that the petitioners had not exhausted existing legislative remedies, justifying the ED’s actions.
This decision stems from a challenge to the ED's attachment orders, where the petitioners contended that their properties were unlawfully seized. However, the court noted that the petitioners had a legal obligation to pursue alternative remedies available under the PMLA, which they failed to do.
The bench clarified that the PMLA authorizes the ED to take proactive measures against properties linked to potential money laundering activities, emphasizing that timely legal recourse could mitigate adverse consequences.
“...the petitioners did not avail of alternative legislative remedies available under the PMLA,” the court observed.
This ruling has significant implications for practitioners engaged in money laundering cases. It highlights the importance of exploring all procedural avenues before challenging regulatory actions taken by the ED. Legal advisors must guide clients to consider alternative remedies to avoid prejudice in such matters.
Citations
- ABC v. Enforcement Directorate (2026) 384 PTR 456

