AI-curated court updates, legal developments, and practice-area insights for Indian legal professionals.
FeaturedThe Karnataka High Court has quashed the dismissal order against a Central Tax Superintendent, ruling that the lack of a personal hearing violated principles of natural justice, thereby nullifying the dismissal.
FeaturedGauhati High Court ruled the cancellation of GST registration without rationale under FORM GST REG-19 was illegal, restoring the taxpayer's ability to respond. The decision reinforces the necessity for transparency in administrative actions.
FeaturedThe Karnataka High Court ruled that blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A without prior hearing violates natural justice principles. The court's decision highlights the importance of procedural fairness in GST-related decisions.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court upheld the reopening of assessments based on allegations of accommodation entries, affirming the sufficiency of prima facie material at the reopening stage. This decision reaffirms the threshold required for reassessment actions.
FeaturedThe ITAT Delhi ruled that reassessment based solely on Revenue Audit objections, without new tangible evidence, constitutes a mere change of opinion and is thus invalid.
FeaturedThe Government has increased the customs duty on gold and silver bullion to 15% through revised notifications effective from May 13, 2026. This update standardizes the duty structure that pertains to various import conditions.
The Karnataka High Court has granted anticipatory bail to GST dealers accused in a bogus input tax credit scheme, emphasizing that genuine purchasers cannot be penalized without proof of collusion.
The Allahabad High Court has held that failure to file objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) bars the challenge to an assessment order, emphasizing procedural compliance in tax disputes. This reinforces the requirement for taxpayers to adhere to stipulated procedural mandates to ensure their rights to challenge assessments.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that Fair Market Value (FMV) will be treated as the Cost of Acquisition under Section 49(2AA) in computing capital gains on Employee Stock Options (ESOPs) for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs). This ruling provides significant tax relief for NRIs in relation to capital gains taxation on ESOPs.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that failure to file objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) bars individuals from challenging assessment orders, emphasizing compliance requirements.
The ITAT upholds the fair market value as the cost of acquisition under Section 49(2AA) for NRIs calculating capital gains on ESOPs, providing significant relief for foreign investors.
The CESTAT has ruled that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for excise duty demands based on ER-6 returns, clarifying taxpayer rights regarding assessments.
The CESTAT has permitted CENVAT credit on residential facilities provided to work-from-home employees, recognizing business operations' evolving structure.