Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe Calcutta High Court ruling raises critical questions about the governing of algorithmic systems under existing statutory provisions.
FeaturedThe Madras High Court condemned the creation of morphed obscene images of women, stating it constitutes a significant violation of privacy and dignity and mandated police action.
FeaturedSEBI explores regulatory measures for AI-driven investment advice, emphasizing continued responsibility for registered advisers for AI-generated recommendations.
FeaturedThe Reserve Bank of India has communicated essential updates regarding the implementation of Section 51A of the UAPA, 1967, in light of changes to the UNSC Sanctions List, affecting various financial institutions.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court has ordered the Registrar of Copyright to consider a bid for registering fully AI-generated artwork, raising significant questions about authorship under the Copyright Act.
RBI's draft guidance emphasizes the importance of board oversight and data governance as foundational elements for responsible AI deployment within financial institutions. This is part of a broader initiative to ensure accountability in data usage.
SEBI has issued a warning to regulated entities and listed companies regarding impersonation scams where fraudsters pose as CEOs or MDs. Entities are advised to implement verification protocols for fund transfer requests and enhance cybersecurity measures.
The Rajasthan High Court denied bail to an accused in a GST fraud case, citing electronic evidence and WhatsApp chats that suggested his direct involvement in the crime.
The Delhi High Court upheld the temporary nationwide blocking of Telegram, implicating copyright enforcement principles in public law. This ruling suggests expanded regulatory power based on platform architecture.
The Delhi High Court upheld a nationwide temporary ban on the Telegram platform, highlighting the implications of platform architecture on regulation. This ruling reflects a shift towards recognizing 'architectural liability' in public law contexts.
The Delhi High Court upheld a temporary nationwide blocking of the messaging platform Telegram, integrating concepts from copyright enforcement into public law. This ruling raises questions about intermediary liability and regulatory interventions based on platform architecture.
The Delhi High Court upheld the temporary blocking of Telegram, citing architectural liability and its implications for public law. The court's decision signals a potential shift in how digital platforms may be regulated under existing laws.