Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
In a significant procedural order, the Calcutta High Court has directed the transfer of Rs. 1.38 Crores to a one-man committee while the main Tower Infotech case awaits further hearing.
The NCLAT has upheld a civil court decree affirming a buyer's possession of properties, limiting the NCLT's jurisdiction in such disputes.
The Orissa High Court upheld an ex parte interim injunction based on Order XXXIX of the CPC, clarifying the legal grounds for granting such injunctions.
This article discusses the evolution of legal deposit in the context of copyright law in India. It questions the current framework and its effectiveness in addressing access and dependency issues.
The second part of the analysis on legal deposit in copyright law continues to explore India's efforts to promote public access to books and knowledge. It evaluates historical developments and current frameworks.
The NCLAT confirmed that a liquidator is permitted to initiate civil proceedings following the termination of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), affirming the need for civil adjudication in such disputes.
The Delhi High Court has referred the issue of whether mediation periods should be excluded from statutory deadlines for written statements to a larger bench. This decision arises from conflicting opinions among lower benches.
The Calcutta High Court upheld the acquittal of a Chartered Accountant in a cheque bounce case, citing insufficient evidence to establish a legally enforceable debt.
This article explores the Delhi High Court's ruling on the temporary blocking of Telegram, analyzing its implications for public law and copyright regulations in India.
This article discusses the evolution of legal deposit in India and its significance post-independence. The Delivery of Books (Public Libraries) Act of 1954 is highlighted, showcasing its role in promoting public libraries and scholarship despite low literacy rates.
The Orissa High Court has deferred a plea concerning the NCLT's jurisdiction over disputes related to a Cuttack club, emphasizing that such matters should be appropriately adjudicated by the trial court at the final hearing stage.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that litigants who seek multiple adjournments cannot later blame their lawyers for delays in proceedings. This ruling reiterates the accountability of litigants in legal processes.