Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
This article outlines the necessary legal steps for incorporating a One Person Company under the Companies Act, including compliance requirements and nominee rules.
ICSI urges the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to enforce Section 203 compliance on eligible companies failing to appoint whole-time company secretaries.
The Calcutta High Court confirms that it can transfer pending winding-up proceedings at its discretion if they have not reached an irreversible stage.
The NCLT has ruled that consent letters alone are insufficient for dispensing with secured creditors' meetings, necessitating the continuation of such meetings.
A newly incorporated company cannot commence business or borrow funds until it fulfills specific filing requirements. Non-compliance may result in penalties under Section 10A.
Companies must file Form DPT-3 by June 30 for all deposits, including director loans and customer advances. This filing is crucial to remain compliant with the statutory requirements.
As of March 2026, India's external debt stands at USD 762.8 billion, reflecting an increase of USD 26.3 billion from March 2025.
The Government of India has announced a re-issue auction for a dated security totaling ₹34,000 crore, maturing in 2036.
The RBI conducted a Variable Rate Repo (VRR) auction with a notified amount of ₹75,000 crore. The total bids received and allotted were ₹69,413 crore, with a cut-off rate of 5.26%.
The Delhi High Court upheld the temporary nationwide blockade of the Telegram platform, linking it to copyright enforcement jurisprudence. This ruling introduces a new concept of architectural liability, reshaping intermediary regulation within public law contexts.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that litigants who seek multiple adjournments cannot later blame their lawyers for delays in proceedings. This ruling reiterates the accountability of litigants in legal processes.
The Tripura High Court acquitted the accused in a cheque dishonour case, ruling that the notice served on a family member did not comply with statutory requirements under Section 138 of the NI Act.