Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Karnataka High Court has quashed amendments to the BBMP fee structure and demand notices, deeming guidance-value-linked levies as arbitrary and unsustainable. This ruling could significantly impact municipal revenue and property valuation practices.
The article discusses whether a deed can be challenged under the writ jurisdiction of High Courts. This issue raises critical considerations in property law and constitutional jurisprudence.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the biological father of a Hindu monk cannot claim compensation for the monk's death in a motor accident, as the monk had renounced worldly life.
The ITAT ruled that properties purchased separately cannot qualify for Section 54F income tax exemptions despite being subsequently amalgamated.
The Gujarat High Court upheld the requirement for an agricultural science degree for valuers of agricultural lands, dismissing a petition challenging the regulatory framework.
The Madras High Court has ruled that unregistered property transfers cannot substantiate depreciation claims under the Income Tax Act.
The Karnataka High Court has accepted a mediation settlement resolving a long-standing land acquisition dispute, thus promoting the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in such cases.
The Karnataka High Court has responded critically to a claim over police quarters land in Bengaluru, questioning the validity of individual ownership against public property. The ruling emphasizes the importance of safeguarding public assets.
The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal clarifies that properties of alleged abettors cannot be attached under PBPT Act unless proven to be benami properties.
The ITAT has partially allowed an appeal clarifying that agricultural land retains its classification even when sold to a non-agriculturist.
The Delhi Gymkhana Club has approached the Delhi High Court against a Central government order mandating the vacating of its premises. The case is set to be heard on May 26.
In a key decision, the Calcutta High Court has upheld the transfer of a suit for the recovery of municipal taxes to the commercial division, reinforcing its alignment with statutory provisions.