Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
FeaturedThe Ministry of Corporate Affairs has amended CSR guidelines to include investments in Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments as valid CSR activities, enabling new funding opportunities for NPOs.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court ruled that Google's practices infringe the trademark 'HINDWARE' by allowing competitors to bid on it as a keyword. This decision marks a significant precedent in trademark law related to keyword advertising.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court has established guidelines for masking personal details in court orders, affirming the right to be forgotten as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. This recognition allows individuals to seek removal of personal information from online judicial records that may harm their dignity and reputation.
FeaturedThe Ministry of Corporate Affairs has reported that the IBC resolution process has facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh crore by March 2026, showcasing the effectiveness of the insolvency framework in India.
FeaturedThe Saket District Court ruled that Anamika Sood is the rightful owner of her song ‘Ferrareee’, dismissing Saregama’s claims of copyright infringement on the grounds of expired rights.
FeaturedIn Hindware v. Grohe, the Delhi High Court clarified the legal standing of keyword advertising and the distinction between generic and trademarked terms. This ruling narrows the safe harbor protections for intermediaries like Google.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court delivered a notable judgment in Bansal v. Philips, deemed a significant step in clarifying SEP and FRAND considerations. This decision addresses essentiality, infringement, and damage calculation in patent law.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court's ruling in Hindware v. Grohe establishes new distinctions in keyword advertising by differentiating between generic and source-identifying marks. This decision narrows the scope for intermediary liability and clarifies trademark law in digital contexts.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court clarified the scope of who qualifies as an 'expert' under Section 63(4) of the BSA, allowing wider certification for digital evidence.
FeaturedThe Supreme Court affirmed that states have the authority to regulate or prohibit betting on skill games, clarifying that Entry 34 encompasses all forms of betting and gambling.
FeaturedThe Reserve Bank of India has communicated essential updates regarding the implementation of Section 51A of the UAPA, 1967, in light of changes to the UNSC Sanctions List, affecting various financial institutions.
FeaturedThe Delhi High Court's Division Bench ruling in Bansal v. Philips outlines essential aspects of Standard Essential Patents and FRAND licensing, making it a critical decision for practitioners in IP law.