Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
A new book titled 'Fractures in IP, Trade, and Health' co-authored by Prof Srividhya Ragavan explores the intersection of public health and intellectual property. The book discusses pressing issues in the context of global trade.
Prof. Srividhya Ragavan and co-author publish 'Fractures in IP, Trade, and Health', focusing on public health frameworks. The book discusses critical intersections of IP and trade in relation to health.
The Delhi High Court's extensive pro tem order in InterDigital v. Transsion is notable for its clarity and balanced approach to SEPs, establishing new protocols around security deposits in ad-interim injunctions.
Discussion surfaces regarding potential amendments to copyright law without public consultations, raising concerns about the democratic process. Stakeholders are urged to remain vigilant due to the lack of transparency in legislative approaches.
This article explores the limits of copyright concerning foundational elements of communication, such as alphabets and languages. It revisits a government opinion from 1958 and questions whether current laws can safeguard the basic tools of expression.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision in SML Limited v. M/S Happy Agro Chemicals clarifies issues of jurisdiction in patent infringement cases, emphasizing the importance of substantial connections to the forum.
A new copyright amendment bill is reportedly on the horizon, but the lack of public consultation raises concerns among stakeholders. This situation highlights the need for transparency in legislative processes.
Anjali Tripathi critiques the legal sustainability of the government's takedown of Satluj from ZEE5, raising questions about censorship under Section 69A.
A copyright amendment bill is reportedly in the works despite the absence of public consultations, leading to concerns about transparency. Stakeholders are urging for an open dialogue to enhance the amendment process.
The abrupt removal of the film 'Satluj' from ZEE5 post-release raises significant legal questions regarding censorship and copyright enforcement. This case exemplifies tensions between access to cultural content and copyright regulations.
Proposals for significant amendments to the Indian Copyright Act are underway despite the absence of a formal public consultation process. Stakeholders have expressed concerns regarding the potential impact of these changes on existing copyright practices and rights.
The recent removal of 'Satluj' from ZEE5 raises important questions about censorship, legality of takedown actions, and implications for copyright law.