Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal ruled that assets belonging to an alleged abettor cannot be attached under the PBPT Act unless proven to be benami properties independently. The tribunal emphasized that the Act allows for attachment only of benami properties held by a benamidar.
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that no TDS is applicable on compensation paid for compulsory land acquisition under mediation agreements. Claimants can initiate execution for unpaid compensation.
The Calcutta High Court upheld that khajna receipts and municipal tax records are sufficient to establish better title in property disputes, leading to the dismissal of an eviction appeal.
The Patna High Court has mandated that the government must resolve contractor claims related to a stalled road project within six weeks, highlighting the importance of timely resolution in infrastructure projects.
The Supreme Court has directed an SIT investigation into the illegal sale of land owned by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's foundation. This follows multiple FIRs alleging unauthorized transactions.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the biological father of a Hindu monk cannot claim compensation for the monk's death in a motor accident, as the monk had renounced worldly life.
The ITAT ruled that properties purchased separately cannot qualify for Section 54F income tax exemptions despite being subsequently amalgamated.
The Gujarat High Court upheld the requirement for an agricultural science degree for valuers of agricultural lands, dismissing a petition challenging the regulatory framework.
The Madras High Court has ruled that unregistered property transfers cannot substantiate depreciation claims under the Income Tax Act.
The Karnataka High Court has accepted a mediation settlement resolving a long-standing land acquisition dispute, thus promoting the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in such cases.
The Karnataka High Court has responded critically to a claim over police quarters land in Bengaluru, questioning the validity of individual ownership against public property. The ruling emphasizes the importance of safeguarding public assets.
The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal clarifies that properties of alleged abettors cannot be attached under PBPT Act unless proven to be benami properties.