Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Gauhati High Court has granted conditional bail to a woman involved in a GST evasion case, requiring her cooperation with the ongoing investigation.
In a ruling by the SAFEMA Tribunal, a PMLA attachment of ₹8.28 lakh was upheld, as the appellant failed to provide necessary bank statements to substantiate claims of being a victim.
The Orissa High Court has quashed a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against an accused in a PMLA case, establishing that summons or bailable warrants must precede an NBW. This ruling clarifies procedural fairness in PMLA trials.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a regular criminal court does not have the authority to order the release of goods seized under the Customs Act, specifically under Section 110A.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of ₹18.10 crores under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies to the petitioner.
A detailed guide explaining the CBI-ED nexus along with 31 FAQs related to predicate offences, PMLA investigations, and more.
Justice Suvra Ghosh of the Calcutta High Court recused herself from a case following allegations of an attempted unauthorized access of court records by a lawyer associated with a Trinamool Congress leader.
A Delhi court acquitted an individual charged with circulating counterfeit currency due to significant investigative flaws, including pre-registered FIR documentation. The court highlighted police's failure to collect evidence.
The Orissa HC quashed a non-bailable warrant issued under the PMLA, mandating that a trial court must first issue summons or a bailable warrant. This ruling clarifies procedural norms in criminal proceedings.
The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain a writ petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of ₹18.10 crore under the PMLA, citing the availability of statutory remedies.
The Uttar Pradesh government has rebutted Rahul Gandhi’s plea in the Supreme Court to quash a summons issued for his remarks about Vinayak Savarkar, citing concerns of inciting hatred.
The Supreme Court has stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Rahul Gandhi regarding his comments about the Indian Army, questioning the relevance of social media commentary in judicial matters.