Latest court orders, judgments, and legal developments from Indian courts — AI-curated and summarized.
The Bombay High Court is set to determine if TNMM bench markings can apply to determine Arms Length Price (ALP) at the entity level regarding combined transactions. The hearing allowed the department to raise additional legal questions.
The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) ruled that the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) is project-specific and cannot exclude buyers based on booking date when construction spans both pre and post-GST periods.
The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) established that appeals for refund of unutilized CENVAT credits existing prior to GST must be addressed to the CESTAT, not GSTAT.
The compliance calendar for August 2026 was released, detailing critical due dates for Income Tax, GST, and ROC. Key deadlines include TDS/TCS deposits and return filings.
The CBDT has exempted the District Legal Services Authority from income tax for FY 2026-27 on several income sources, promoting non-commercial legal services. This exemption is conditional on compliance with applicable regulations.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has granted income tax exemption to the Haryana State Board of Technical Education, applicable retrospectively. This move is significant for educational institutions seeking financial relief.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that land designated for roads and gardens cannot be classified as closing stock under Section 145A of the Income Tax Act.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal determined that not consulting the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) regarding Arm's Length Price (ALP) is a procedural irregularity that can be cured.
The RBI has announced the auction of Treasury Bills worth ₹9,000 Crore for 91-Day and ₹8,000 Crore for 182-Day, with the auction scheduled on August 12, 2026. Settlement will occur the following day.
Several State Governments, including Andhra Pradesh, are set to auction stocks amounting to ₹15,300 Crore in total. This auction includes several financial instruments with specific tenures, mainly focused on yield.
The discussion revolves around whether a taxpayer can be compelled to claim and reverse ITC not availed in GSTR-3B based solely on its appearance in GSTR-2B. This raises important questions regarding the interpretation of the GST framework and taxpayer rights.
The Rajasthan High Court has restored a taxpayer's GST appeal, which was delayed due to their daughter’s marriage and late knowledge of the demand. The Court's ruling stressed on the importance of on-merits hearings and fairness towards taxpayers.