Skip to main content
Limitation Runs From Filing of Complaint, Not Magistrate’s Cognizance: SC
Back to Court News
Supreme Court of Indiacriminalconstitutional

Limitation Runs From Filing of Complaint, Not Magistrate’s Cognizance: SC

August 22, 2026

In a crucial ruling, the Supreme Court clarified that the limitation period under Section 468 of the CrPC begins from the filing of a complaint rather than from the cognizance taken by a magistrate. This overturns a prior Delhi High Court order.

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Period Under CrPC

The Supreme Court has set an important precedent by ruling that the limitation period under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) initiates from the filing of a complaint, not when a magistrate takes cognizance of the matter. This decision came in light of an appeal that challenged the earlier Delhi High Court's directive which quashed an FIR.

The court emphasized that understanding the limitation period is vital for both the prosecution and defense in criminal proceedings. Consequently, the Supreme Court reinstated the FIR, highlighting that proceedings would remain valid within the prescribed limitation period from the initial complaint, thus preserving the integrity of criminal justice.

This decision holds significant relevance for practitioners, ensuring clarity in procedural timelines for criminal cases. Lawyers must be vigilant about when a complaint is filed, as it directly affects the legality of criminal action under the CrPC.

Citations

  • SC Order (2026) 1 SCC 505
Practice Areas:criminalconstitutional
Limitation Runs From Filing of Complaint, Not Magistrate’s Cognizance: SC | Gatim AI Court News | Gatim AI