The ITAT partly allowed an appeal, remanding issues regarding ₹11.14 crore in bogus purchases and ₹16.76 lakh in labour charge disallowance for fresh verification, citing unverified transactions.
ITAT Rejection of Evidence Under Rule 46A
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has partly allowed an appeal for statistical purposes, addressing issues related to ₹11.14 crore in bogus purchases and ₹16.76 lakh in labour-charge disallowance. The court has remanded these matters back to the lower authorities for fresh verification due to the unverified nature of the transactions.
The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantiated evidence when a taxpayer makes claims that substantially affect tax evaluations. Notably, any determination of bogus purchases must be backed by credible verification processes as prescribed under Indian tax regulations.
This ruling underscores the importance of maintaining accurate transaction records and the repercussions of inadequate evidence in tax assessments. Practitioners must ensure rigorous documentation to avoid similar disputes in the future.
Citations
- ITAT (2026) Taxscan

