The Delhi High Court imposed ₹10,000 costs on an advocate for appearing in a virtual hearing while walking in a garden, violating decorum norms under the Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules, 2025. The court emphasized the need for seriousness and connectivity standards in remote proceedings.
The Delhi High Court on October 10, 2026, imposed costs of ₹10,000 on an advocate for appearing in a virtual hearing while walking in a garden, observing that such conduct undermines the dignity of judicial proceedings. Justice Om Prakash Shukla noted that the lawyer’s unstable internet connection and physical movement during the hearing violated Rule 7 of the Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules, 2025, which mandates a stable and respectful environment during virtual appearances.
"Learned Counsel is appearing in this matter while walking in the garden and the connection is also not proper. This is in violation of the Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules, 2025 of this Court," the judge remarked. The court reiterated that virtual hearings are not to be treated casually and require the same level of decorum as physical appearances. The rules specifically require participants to remain stationary in a quiet, professional setting with reliable connectivity.
This ruling serves as a cautionary note to legal practitioners conducting remote appearances. With virtual hearings continuing in select matters post-pandemic, courts are reinforcing standards of conduct. Practitioners must ensure compliance with local EVC rules, including location, attire, and technical readiness—failure to do so may invite adverse orders, including costs or even contempt.
Citations
- Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules, 2025, Rule 7
